Monday, September 18, 2017

Meeting of the Minds, September 11, 2017



    At our meeting of the Wise Guys on August 21,2017 and then again on September 12, 2017 we dealt with the well-publicized violent demonstration in Charlottesville Virginia. The incident was initiated by a City Council vote to remove a statue of General Robert E. Lee from Robert E. Lee Park. A group of over 100 white nationalists carried torches in Charlottesville protesting the removal of the Lee monument as an affront to their notion of white supremacy. Their shouting of anti-Semitic slogans was chilling, reminiscent of similar demonstrations in WW2 Germany. A group of antifascists opposed the neo-Nazis in what became a lethal confrontation. To the white nationalists, Lee was a beloved confederate icon who came to represent a supporter of their effort to support and preserve the white race .To the antifascists, recall of Lee represented a clarion call for racism and bigotry. These opposing views of the warring factions were generated by different memories of identical historical events, consequent to different myths.  The role of myth making is central to understanding of these issues.

   Myths are generally concerned with a return to a lost paradise, wherein heroes roamed the earth in search of eternity. Such a paradise is contained within the Lost Cause Myth, generated by a defeated South. It heroes consisted of   its brave soldiers, loyal civilians and sainted generals such as Lee and Stonewall Jackson.  These men are regarded as stalwart brave, noble leaders, truly iconic characters who were doomed to oblivion, but for the persistent memory of slavery.  The fact that many in the North bought into the Myth of the Lost Cause is evidence that the issues resonated with northern beliefs of white superiority.


   After the defeat of the confederacy, the South was left bereft of its meaning and hope for the future. With the efforts of Lee and Jubal Early, history was rewritten in the form of the Lost Cause Myth. The myth represented a counter narrative whose purpose was to come to terms with an unacceptable reality, i.e. a defeated South.  In so doing the effort was intended to create space for living within the boundaries of the newly created reality.  According to the myth the South was defeated not due to military failure, but to being outmanned and outgunned. The outcome of the conflict was therefore rigged and inevitable. But the myth cannot out trump the reality of a system bankrupt of moral authority.
  
  According to this Southern generated myth, Lee struggled with whether his ties to the South took precedence over those to the United States. . Unfortunately for him and the country, he chose to ignore his close ties to the North and elected go with the South. His choice to go with the south was a tragedy to himself and to the country of his birth, The fact that most of the South and many in the North continue to honor Lee as an American hero points to the enduring quality of the Lost Cause Myth.

    However, consideration of the facts justifies rejection of the myth and consequently of Lee as s national hero. Lee could rightly be held responsible for the loss of the war.  The original strategy for defeating the North was the assumption of a defensive strategy aimed at preserving southern strength and impressing on the North the difficulty and inadvisability of continued warfare.  With Lee’s leadership, the South assumed an offensive posture, resulting in excessive loss of manpower and eventual defeat. As for Grant, the victorious general, the Myth generally ignores him, or regards him as a butcher without military skill.

   Although Lee claimed to be a son of the South, he lived most of his adult life in the in Arlington, which was part of Washington D.C. until retrocession to Virginia in 1847.  Of especial significance was Lee’s close relationship to the founding fathers, especially George Washington. He was related to a revolutionary war hero Light Horse Harry. He was not only a distant blood relative of Washington but was married to the daughter of the stepson of the first president.  Most ironically, his family owned Mount Vernon and leased it to Washington until its ownership passed on the Washington family. Finally he admitted that all he was he owed to the United Sates of America.  Why his ties to the United States were not enduring remains a mystery to this day.  Lee was and remains a hero to many on both sides of the Mason-Dixon line, but as a hero he is tainted with the moniker of traitor.

   The Lost Cause Myth is concerned not only with Lee but also with broader issues related to the war itself. The Myth argues that the cause of the Civil War was not slavery but preservation of the southern away of life, i.e. moonlight and magnolias. The black slaves were viewed as gentle people, unable to survive independently and thus grateful for the opportunity to serve their masters. .  Slavery was looked upon not as an evil but as a special form of benevolence for an inferior race. However, beneath the picture of beauty and serenity was the dark reality of human bondage with its attendant abuse and cruelty.

    With time the Myth has been fading into obscurity. Nonetheless, remnants hang over our society like a bad dream.  Occasionally, we awaken to old animosities and new violence. The Black Lives Matter slogan is an expression arising from Lost Cause championing of white supremacy. Ironically, many in the North bought into the post war myth. complicating the resolution of sectional differences  up to this today.  It may be that an additional century is required before these ideas are finally abandoned and hope for a united society can be rekindled.
.
Posted by Arthur Banner





Thursday, September 7, 2017

Our Korean Peace Action Resolved?

Leverage is the Kim family game and has been since July 27, 1953 when Kim III’s grandfather picked up the shambles remaining in North Korea as Chinese troops exited north and Stalin began refilling his ammunition belts. Their family’s long game remains unchanged. While South Korea followed the capitalist path to gain leverage in world affairs and among neighbors, the Kim family followed Stalin’s model of Dictatorship of the Proletariat. We should have no confusion about that path. While war can be the ultimate consequence, it is not the intended consequence.
 The intended consequence is maximizing leverage against the primary enemy, which is the U.S., the capitalist power sponsoring capitalism in Seoul. To Pyongyang  the South Korean regime is weak, always has been. Without their U.S. ally, they are pussies while in Kim’s own mirror his regime is strong, resolute and backed by every comrade north of the 38th parallel.
 So he is engaged in no contest beyond leverage. With his claimed hydrogen bomb attached to a missile system he is close to maximizing his leverage. That does not mean war, it means an ideal time to negotiate via the United Nation’s Security Council and end the century-old war with capitalism: South Korea, Japan and its ally, the U.S.
Kim sees the U.S. and U.N. as backing two losing powers in Asia’s Pacific War, Tokyo and Pyongyang. Meanwhile, he is allied with two winners, Moscow and Beijing. So the Security Council now may be ideally situated to again negotiate.
Plenty of back doors if our leaders are willing to use them.

My short synopsis of how to resolve our ongoing Korean Peace Action. After-all, it’s been my war all these years; now the path seems clearer than in the past.

Post by John Badgley